In a nationalized overall health care program, you have to have to know who is who – otherwise the technique could in no way be able determine who is entitled. The structure depends on how the method is developed and designed, but with a nationalized overall health care method you will be tracked by the state where you reside and how you move in a manner that is unseen in America. The nationalized health care program becomes a car for population handle.
If you leave the United States and are no longer a resident of the state, even if you are a citizen and could maintain a driving license, you will have to report quickly if you want to stay clear of the 13% health care tax. I use the number 13% as it is in Sweden to exemplify the actual tax pressure that is laid upon you for the nationalized wellness care.
Let’s say you moved and you do not want to pay the 13% tax for solutions you do not receive, can receive, or want to taken out from the tax roll. The mammoth entity has no interest to let you go so quick. You will end up having to reveal your private life – partner, dwellings, travel, income, and job to prove your case that you have the correct to leave the public overall health care technique and do not will need to pay the tax. If 女性護理 have to seek an appeal, your details could be a component of administrative court documents that are open and public documents. As quickly as you return to the United States, you will be automatically enrolled once more and the taxes begin to pile up.
Public universal health care has no interest in guarding your privacy. They want their tax revenue and, to fight for your rights, you will have to prove that you meet the specifications to not be taxable. In that approach, your private life is up for show.
The national ID-card and national population registry that involves your health-related information is a foundation of the nationalized well being care program. You can see exactly where this is going – population control and ability to use the law and overall health care access to map your complete private life in public searchable databases owned and operated by the government.
By operating an impeccable population registry that tracks where you reside, who you live with, when you move and your citizen status including residency the Swedes can separate who can obtain universal health care from those not entitled. The Swedish authorities will know if you have a Swedish social security number, with the tap of the keyboard, additional info about yourself than you can don’t forget. The Swedish government has taken sharing of data among agencies to a new level. The purpose is incredibly straightforward – to collect health care tax and suppress any tax evasion.
It is heavily centralized and only the central administration can modify the registered info in the information. So if you want to adjust your name, even the slightest alter, you have to file an application at a national agency that processes your paperwork. This centralized population registry tends to make it doable to identify who is who under all circumstances and it is important for the national health care technique. Otherwise, any individual could claim to be entitled.
To implement that in the United States calls for a completely new doctrine for population registry and control. In an American context that would require that every single existing driving license had to be voided and reapplied beneath stricter identification guidelines that would match not only data from Internal Income Service, state government, municipal government, Social Security Administration, and Division of Homeland Safety but pretty much any agency that delivers services to the general public. The reason why a new population registry would be required in the United States is the fact that lax guidelines dating back to the 1940s up till the War on Terrorism, and stricter identification criteria following 9/11, has made a substantial percentage of individual facts about men and women questionable.
If America rather neglects maintaining secure records, determining eligibility for public health care would not be doable and the floodgates for fraud would open and rampant misuse of the program would prevail. This would ultimately bring down the system.
It is financially impossible to generate a universal overall health care program without having clearly being aware of who is entitled and not. The method needs to have limits of its entitlement. A social safety number would not be sufficient as these numbers have been handed out by means of decades to short-term residents that may not even live in the United States or might today be out of status as illegal immigrants.